Close Menu
    Trending
    • Hawkins Way Spend $80M on UWS Student Housing 
    • Mark Nussbaum, Riverside Abstract Ran Massive Mortgage Fraud Scheme
    • One High Line Penthouse Asking $27M Snags Contract
    • Zeckendorf’s 80 Clarkson Snags $80M Penthouse Contract
    • Chetrits Facing More Distress in the Financial District
    • How America’s rent calendar punishes the workers it should protect
    • Mattson goes to trial; SF transfer tax cut on hold
    • New York Top Real Estate Deals: Friday, June 12, 2026
    WorldEstateUSA
    • Home
    • Real Estate
    • Real Estate News
    • Real Estate Analysis
    • House Flipping
    • Property Investment
    WorldEstateUSA
    Home»Real Estate News»Mark Nussbaum, Riverside Abstract Ran Massive Mortgage Fraud Scheme

    Mark Nussbaum, Riverside Abstract Ran Massive Mortgage Fraud Scheme

    Team_WorldEstateUSABy Team_WorldEstateUSAJune 15, 2026No Comments6 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    For years, title firm Riverside and legislation agency Nussbaum Lowinger have been dogged by rumors of mortgage fraud.

    Now, a sweeping lawsuit claims the corporations orchestrated a years-long scheme involving dozens of fraudulent actual property transactions, misappropriated escrow funds and hid kickbacks via charitable donations. 

    Lakewood, New Jersey-based Blueberry Funding and Florida-based lender EADMK filed a lawsuit in New York’s Southern District towards Mark Nussbaum, Samuel Lowinger, Riverside and its house owners, Shaul Greenwald, Avery Eisenreich and Yoel Zagelbaum, and two former staff to recoup $87.5 million in lacking funds that have been alleged to be held within the now-shuttered legislation agency Nussbaum Lowinger’s escrow accounts. As a substitute, Nussbaum wired cash out of escrow accounts to Riverside, so the title agency may facilitate fraudulent offers, Blueberry and EADMK allege.

    The authorized filings painting Riverside and Nussbaum Lowinger because the architects of a sprawling fraud that used consumer escrow accounts and 1031-exchange funds to inflate property values, safe outsized loans and siphon off illicit income. Riverside and Nussbaum Lowinger acquired kickbacks on every fraudulent deal and laundered a few of them via charitable donations, the grievance alleges. 

    The brand new filings vastly broaden the scope of the alleged misconduct and supply new particulars about how the transactions have been structured and financed. It additionally raises questions on why prosecutors haven’t pressed costs towards the gamers concerned.

    The scheme

    In response to the lawsuit, first reported by the Promote, the operation dates again to at the very least 2018 and adopted a constant playbook: A purchaser acquires a property below contract and shortly assigns the contract to a associated get together at an inflated worth. The second sale is solely fraudulent, the lawsuit alleges. However Riverside acts because the title and shutting agent, making the offers look reputable, although no cash exchanges palms, in keeping with sources conversant in the scheme.

    The client may then solicit a bigger mortgage based mostly on the inflated sale worth than would have in any other case have been potential. The members would pocket the distinction between the inflated mortgage and the precise gross sales worth.

    In a single instance cited by the lawsuit, a purchaser acquired a property referred to as Park at Crestview in Austin, Texas, for about $40.1 million in 2023. The contract was shortly assigned to a brand new “purchaser” for $54 million. The inflated valuation resulted within the lender, Lument Actual Property, offering $42 million to Riverside, Nussbaum, and co-conspirators — virtually $2 million greater than the actual worth. 

    In response to the lawsuit, the settlement statements ready by Riverside additionally consisted of unusually giant charges, together with $23,677 to Riverside and a $138,685 “dealer payment” to Fortune Capital Group, regardless of Fortune by no means serving as a dealer on the deal, plus $50,000 to Nussbaum Lowinger for authorized charges. 

    In an effort to fund the flips, Nussbaum Lowinger and Riverside required fixed short-term bridge loans to make the second fraudulent deal seem actual. That is the place Blueberry and EADMK are available. They allege Nussbaum Lowinger used their escrow cash with out their information to supply bridge loans. 

    “The scheme required a steady provide of recent lender deposits in an effort to function, as every new closing relied on the funds from the prior closing,” the lawsuit mentioned.

    Riverside, Greenwald, Eisenreich, Zagelbaum, Nussbaum, and Lowinger didn’t instantly return a request to remark.

    1031 Exchanges and charity kickbacks

    Screenshot

    Nussbaum and Riverside’s founder, Greenwald, allegedly created two further fraudulent schemes to complement themselves.

    Nussbaum and Riverside allegedly used the 1031 change program — which permits firms to defer capital features taxes by reinvesting income into like-kind properties — to facilitate kickbacks. Beneath tax legislation, the preliminary gross sales proceeds must be held by a 3rd get together. 

    In response to the lawsuit, Nussbaum directed 1031 change purchasers to Riverside. As a substitute of holding the cash in its escrow account, Riverside lent out the cash at 2 % curiosity per thirty days. Riverside paid Nussbaum 1 % per thirty days in curiosity as a kickback. Nussbaum and Greenwald described the phrases of the deal in a December 2021 textual content change.

    “I overlook our deal on 1031,” Greenwald texted.  

    Nussbaum responded, “1 level a month I believe.” Greenwald mentioned that Riverside was “loaning it out at 2 plus.” 

    Greenwald and Nussbaum allegedly used charitable donations to cowl up their fraud.

    Nussbaum himself and Nussbaum Lowinger employees allegedly disbursed a few of the proceeds of the fraudulent flips and 1031 offers by writing checks or wiring funds to charitable organizations at Greenwald or Nussbaum’s path. The donations hid a few of the charges made out of the flips and 1031 fraud, in keeping with the lawsuit. Nussbaum and Greenwald’s actual ties to all the charities are unclear. But it surely’s clear from the lawsuit and messages that Nussbaum and Greenwald gave express directions about which charities the cash ought to go to.

    These charities included Pomona Jewish Group, Ohr Shlomo Chasidic Middle, Chabad of Pomona, Tomche Shabbas of Monsey, Harchava Charitable Fund, Bais Menachem North Miami Seashore, and Rofeh Cholim Most cancers Society (RCCS), to which funds have been directed within the title of “Mark Nussbaum RCCS Hockey,” in keeping with the lawsuit.

    In a single message, Greenwald requested Riverside to ship $5,000 to RCCS, “In honor of Mendy & Chanie Fischer and household for Mark Nussbaum RCCS Hockey.” 

    A Riverside worker responded, “sure however it is advisable to allow them to know [the charity] can’t write something.” 

    The worker made the request to cover the title of the donor as a result of Greenwald couldn’t difficulty a written acknowledgement of the donation or it might be seen as a kickback. 

    The lawsuit doesn’t explicitly say to what extent the charities might have recognized concerning the fraud.

    The association started to unravel in early 2025, when Blueberry and different Nussbaum Lowinger purchasers started asking for his or her escrow a reimbursement. Nussbaum’s enterprise companion Mendel Steiner died by suicide and Nussbaum Lowinger shut down. Immediately, escrow purchasers are looking for more than $400 million from the agency. The Manhattan District Legal professional’s workplace charged Nussbaum with diverting greater than $15 million in escrow funds. Nussbaum pleaded not responsible. Neither Nussbaum nor his companion, Samuel Lowinger, have confronted any costs associated to mortgage fraud.

    Riverside was blacklisted from Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae in 2024 for appearing because the title agent on a fraudulent flip involving Brooklyn dealmakers Boruch Drillman and Aron Puretz. Riverside has not confronted any legal costs. The corporate began off in title insurance coverage however branched into 1031 change, LLC formation and value segregation.

    The agency’s unofficial motto was “Do no matter it takes.”

    Learn extra

    Riverside Abstract’s dedication to client service may have gone too far


    Mark Nussbaum

    Nussbaum Lowinger files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy


    The mortgage fraud scam exposing broader cracks in small-time commercial lending






    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleOne High Line Penthouse Asking $27M Snags Contract
    Next Article Hawkins Way Spend $80M on UWS Student Housing 
    Team_WorldEstateUSA
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Hawkins Way Spend $80M on UWS Student Housing 

    June 15, 2026

    Zeckendorf’s 80 Clarkson Snags $80M Penthouse Contract

    June 15, 2026

    Chetrits Facing More Distress in the Financial District

    June 15, 2026
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    Pied-à-terre, Cash-Purchase Taxes Will Shift New York Market

    May 19, 20262 Views

    Rithm Capital Nears First Deal Since Paramount Buy

    April 10, 20269 Views

    We’re in a “Buyer’s Market”…But Where Are the Real Estate Deals? (Rookie Reply)

    November 22, 202518 Views

    Zillow announces promotions, including new chief product officer

    February 26, 202615 Views

    OCC proposes simplified CRA plans for community banks

    December 18, 20254 Views
    Categories
    • House Flipping
    • Property Investment
    • Real Estate
    • Real Estate Analysis
    • Real Estate News
    Most Popular

    2026 Home Price Predictions: The Correction Continues?

    December 8, 20251,570 Views

    Real Estate Scion is Holdout Against Artists in Soho Drama

    November 28, 202549 Views

    Larry Ellison Buys Two Pierre Units From Shari Redstone

    November 27, 202537 Views
    Our Picks

    How New Housing Ballot Measures Will Change NYC Development

    November 8, 2025

    Jay Group Closes on $130M Development Site in Greenpoint

    December 2, 2025

    Mamdani Housing Plan Courts Developers, Targets Landlords

    May 26, 2026
    Categories
    • House Flipping
    • Property Investment
    • Real Estate
    • Real Estate Analysis
    • Real Estate News
    • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • Terms and Conditions
    • About us
    • Contact us
    Copyright © 2025 Worldestateusa.com All Rights Reserved.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.