New-home builders are getting into 2026 with one thing the market hasn’t had a lot of these days: cautious optimism. In a current outlook survey performed by Builder Advisor Group and Avila Actual Property Capital, most homebuilding executives signaled expectations for improved market situations, at the same time as “demand uncertainty” stays the dominant concern. On this govt dialog, Tony Avila of Builder Advisor Group and Avila Actual Property Capital breaks down what the survey revealed, why builder finance is shifting away from conventional financial institution lending, the place land-banking friction is displaying up most, and what personal capital is underwriting for in at present’s setting.
HousingWire: I perceive Builder Advisor Group and Avila Actual Property Capital lately accomplished a survey of homebuilding executives about their outlook on the trade. What did you study?
Tony Avila: The largest shock was the comparatively optimistic tone. There was an awesome feeling that 2026 can be higher than 2025 — higher orders and a greater order tempo per neighborhood. We’ve heard that instantly from builders as nicely: some are nonetheless comparatively flat, however most are saying yr over yr is healthier.
That mentioned, “demand uncertainty” remains to be entrance and middle. Within the survey, 56% of respondents mentioned market or demand uncertainty is their No. 1 concern. In conversations with each private and non-private builders, that’s nonetheless the core theme — even after they’re seeing indicators of enchancment. We’ve had builders inform us they’ve seen their finest orders in the previous few weeks in comparison with the prior six months.
One nuance price noting: bigger builders have been much less optimistic. Amongst respondents over $1 billion in annual income, the skew was flatter to down versus final yr.
HW: Are we seeing a structural reset in how builders finance development — which means extra equity-heavy capital stacks and fewer conventional bank-led buildings — or is that this only a cyclical tightening?
TA: My view is that it’s structural, particularly because it pertains to land. We’re seeing much less financial institution lending to personal builders, with personal capital sources stepping in to fill the void. One instance: Flagstar shut down its lending to personal homebuilders, and we employed that origination crew to assist decide up the slack. We’ve additionally seen pullbacks in acquisition, growth and construction lending for personal builders and builders.
The “why” is vital. Banks are penalized by regulators for land loans — greater reserve necessities, greater capital necessities — making these loans much less engaging or unprofitable. I don’t see that altering shortly primarily based on current regulatory historical past.
There’s additionally a balance-sheet actuality: banks need deposits, and personal builders sometimes don’t carry massive money balances as a result of development consumes capital (land and work-in-process). That misalignment makes banks extra reluctant to increase further credit score, even to in any other case robust operators. Non-public capital doesn’t have the identical deposit constraint, which is one cause personal builders are migrating to platforms like ours for development lending.
HW: The place do you see the most important friction at present between builders and land-banking companions — pricing, tempo expectations, or threat allocation?
TA: Tempo. Absorption tempo has slowed dramatically over the previous year-plus, and that slowdown creates strain that must be renegotiated. We’re seeing builders gradual the tempo of takedowns, and in some situations we’re seeing cancellations of choice contracts.
When tempo adjustments, all the things downstream will get careworn — timelines, carry prices, and the assumptions that land-banking buildings have been constructed on. That’s the place the friction is displaying up most clearly proper now.
HW: What has modified most in purchaser psychology since final yr?
TA: The largest shift is that patrons have lately seen a number of the finest affordability they’ve had within the final 4 years. From January 2025 to January 2026, common funds fell about 8%, and that’s beginning to convey some patrons off the sidelines — particularly first-time patrons who’re reengaging with the thought of proudly owning a house.
You’re additionally seeing confidence stabilize. Among the concern round financial disruption — whether or not from AI-related layoffs or broader uncertainty — hasn’t materialized the way in which individuals apprehensive it would. Unemployment remains to be round 4.7%, and that helps demand on the margin.
Affordability remains to be an actual constraint, although. Funds stay excessive relative to median revenue, and that continues to restrict the pool of certified patrons.
HW: In a market the place uncertainty remains to be excessive, what sorts of operators are finest positioned to develop proper now — extremely capitalized nationals, nimble regional privates, or a hybrid mannequin with institutional backing?
TA: The operators finest positioned to develop are these with a number of product traces and geographic diversification. For those who’re concentrated in a single market phase or a single geography, you’re extra uncovered to localized slowdowns.
We’re seeing alternatives in markets just like the Carolinas, components of the Pacific Northwest, and even some Midwest markets which might be nonetheless rising. The power to maneuver throughout product sorts and markets—relying on the place demand is strongest — issues extra on this cycle than it has shortly.
HW: Do you see personal homebuilders persevering with to really feel strain on new land acquisition alternatives — significantly as bigger publics and global-capital-backed gamers grow to be extra aggressive?
TA: Sure — capital stays a continuing problem, particularly for builders exterior the highest 30 or 40. Land acquisition nonetheless requires significant upfront capitalization, and plenty of personal builders are asking the identical query: “How are we going to capitalize this land funding?”
And it’s not solely a private-builder situation. Even some public builders are capital constrained and must watch out about how they allocate capital.
By way of aggressive strain, the larger dynamic we’re watching is what occurs when a big builder cuts costs. That places actual strain on smaller builders in the identical submarket — particularly these attempting to protect margin. We’re seeing instances the place smaller builders preserve pricing self-discipline and nonetheless ship robust margins, however they sacrifice absorption tempo as a result of close by opponents are shopping for demand with value cuts.
HW: What makes a builder “fundable” at present from a personal capital standpoint — operational self-discipline, land technique, management depth, or one thing else?
TA: It’s a mix, however it begins with expertise and observe report. We’re on the lookout for proof of sustained efficiency — three-plus years of rising earnings, historic margins, gross margin and EBITDA margin developments, and whether or not closings are rising.
We additionally underwrite the steadiness sheet: Are they over-levered? Have they got reserves? What does capitalization appear like at present? From there, we take a look at the precise initiatives needing financing and assess anticipated profitability.
Market issues, too. We’ll consider supply-demand steadiness within the markets the place they function, and typically we’ll fee a third-party market research to validate demand and aggressive dynamics.
On the flip facet, the crimson flags are easy: weak profitability, restricted reserves, and restricted capital — particularly if the corporate isn’t throwing off earnings that may cushion volatility.
We do use a proprietary scoring methodology that comes with these elements — monetary metrics, market dynamics, operational execution, and extra — to reach at a go/no-go determination. That framework has been refined over 30-plus years of working with builders and builders, together with metrics like stock turns and development velocity — how briskly a builder can get out and in of a house.
