A Blackstone-owned Seattle workplace tower may very well be underwater — actually.
Frankfurt-based Dekabank alleges in a lawsuit that Blackstone Property Companions’ fund didn’t restore and preserve the 23-story Alternate Constructing in Downtown Seattle, permitting “persistent water intrusions” by the property home windows, requiring a full restore of the constructing facade.
Dekabank, the lender on the property, alleges Blackstone’s inaction has been “disastrous” and led to not less than $17 million in repairs.
The German lender additional alleges Blackstone was extra involved with the underside line than the state of the property. Blackstone delay upkeep that will have prevented the water injury, in response to the lawsuit.
Dekabank filed the lawsuit in New York Supreme Court docket on January 21. Blackstone strongly denies the allegation in an announcement.
“Dekabank’s claims are with out benefit,” mentioned a spokesperson for Blackstone. “We’ve got been responsibly managing this asset since our acquisition in 2017 and are upset with the trail Dekabank has chosen to take. We are going to reply within the atypical course as a part of the authorized course of.”
Dekabank offered an preliminary $97.1 million mortgage to Blackstone for the workplace tower in Downtown Seattle in 2017. Blackstone employed its affiliate Fairness Workplace Administration because the property supervisor.
In 2022, Blackstone refinanced the tower once more with Dekabank. As a part of the refinancing, Blackstone allegedly entered right into a carry assure, which ensured it might cowl working bills related to the mission, the lender claims.
In keeping with the lawsuit, Blackstone must fulfill 18 completely different situations to ensure that the carry assure to run out, together with a certification displaying it paid all working bills.
Dekabank alleges Blackstone didn’t fulfill two of the necessities and the carry assure remained in place.
Because it sought to evaluate whether or not Blackstone happy the situations of the carry assure, Dekabank claims it carried out intensive due diligence on the property. Throughout this time interval, the mortgage matured, in response to Dekabank’s lawsuit.
The lender employed a marketing consultant to carry out a wide-ranging analysis of the property website, construction, facade and home windows.
Dekabank known as the marketing consultant’s outcomes “stunning.” The property allegedly suffered substantial injury to its facade. The constructing required $17.2 million in short-term repairs with an extra $13.1 million required in reserves, in response to Dekabank.
Parts of the façade had been exhibiting “deficiencies and proof of deferred upkeep,” in response to Dekabank.
Water was allegedly in a position to infiltrate the property in a number of areas. The chief engineer of the property even revealed that he was conscious of lively leaks on the fourth, fifth, sixteenth, 18th and twenty first flooring, in response to the lawsuit.
The property supervisor additionally confirmed there had been water leakage points by the home windows and partitions of the property since not less than 2018, the lawsuit alleges.
“Borrower undertook little greater than band-aid repairs, which had been inadequate to stem the tide of water pouring into the property and inflicting widespread injury,” Dekabank mentioned in its lawsuit.
Learn extra
Blackstone’s real estate fund delivers more than 8% annual gain
Venture capitalist sues over damage to gold-leaf wallpaper
Blackstone Real Estate co-head Kathleen McCarthy to depart after 15 years
