We’re excited to announce that Jonathan Miller, who has lengthy authored probably the most authoritative report on the residential actual property market, is partnering with The Actual Deal. Under, you’ll discover his Housing Notes column, which can now run on our website a number of instances every week. As well as, Miller’s quarterly report for New York Metropolis, which he printed via Douglas Elliman for greater than three a long time, will now be “The Actual Deal report, ready by Jonathan Miller.” Miller’s knowledge enterprise, Streetmatrix, which supplies hyperlocal knowledge, will present statistics to TRD Information subscribers.
— TRD editors
Bubble home bought for first time in 50 years
This home was marketed for the first time 50 years back in 2025, asking $5.75 million, and simply closed for $4.99 million.
It’s most likely not a coincidence that the house’s development coincides with the moon touchdown, however the home windows additionally bring to mind portholes — a nautical motif that was additionally fashionable within the Nineteen Sixties.
Throughout my Manhattan 8,000+ appraisal profession, I walked by the “Bubble Home” many instances on East 71st Avenue on the Higher East Aspect of Manhattan. As an armchair architect who is aware of simply sufficient in regards to the matter to be harmful, I’ve by no means related the title “Bubble Home” with the property itself. However when Curbed interviewed me for this story — Is This the End for the Bubble House? — the reference introduced the home again to thoughts. I personally think of the bubbles and the pink stucco as ugly, not for any architectural significance. However once more, I’ve no architectural avenue cred. The Bubble Home architect, Maurice Medcalf, accomplished the new design of the 1901 townhouse in 1969 on the peak of the area race.
Apparently, the home isn’t landmarked, so there is no requirement to keep the oval windows and pink stucco facade, and I’m guessing these bubbles received’t stick round, particularly as a result of there are not any screens.
Final Friday, the agent closed on the sale:
to a household that wasn’t looking for an architectural oddity. They’ll “very doubtless” take out the home windows, he says. In any case, “the bulk who got here in have been planning on restoring it to a extra conventional façade.”
And the most effective quote of the Curbed piece:
Then there have been the home windows, which spin open from a central level, making them not possible to display from bugs, amongst different issues.
Not typical market suggestions for a townhouse itemizing!
Stone Home at 130 East sixty fourth Avenue noticed premium
Once I spoke in regards to the Bubble Home above, I keep in mind appraising a townhouse in the area a few decade in the past for a sale. The architect Edward Durell Stone designed it, finest recognized for the General Motors Building, the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts and 2 Columbus Circle, which is commonly voted one of the ugliest buildings in NYC.
I thought about this house, however I couldn’t initially keep in mind the handle, solely the architect, oddly sufficient. I describe 130 East sixty fourth Avenue, on one in all my favourite townhouse blocks on the Higher East Aspect, as a 1960’s renovation (actually 1956). It was initially a standard 4,850-square-foot townhouse inbuilt 1899, which obtained a stack of white-painted cinder blocks in entrance of it, among the many renovation highlights. My colleagues within the appraisal trade name these “why me” value determinations as a result of that’s what you say to your self while you stroll as much as a property like this — you simply know there are not any comps. And a purchaser can’t take away the facade since it’s protected in perpetuity by an easement.
What was stunning about the sale back in 2015 was that many individuals appeared to be rabid followers of Edward Durell Stone, and the house bought for a premium above the standard townhouse market on the time — not above the asking value, although. The townhouse bought for $6,850,000, nonetheless thought of a premium a decade in the past, though it was initially listed at $9,995,000.
The Manhattan townhouse market 1Q26
For a refresher, I took a have a look at my most up-to-date Manhattan townhouse knowledge and a slice from 2015.
The seemingly runaway value development noticed within the first-quarter numbers is obvious within the 69.4 p.c annual enhance in median gross sales value. These metrics are taken from my 1Q26 Manhattan Market Report, accomplished on the finish of the primary quarter. (This report shall be known as The Actual Deal Manhattan Market Report starting in 2Q26).
The townhouse value skew was largely as a result of 29.9 p.c rise in common sale dimension, mixed with the quirks of the various high quality of properties accessible on the market. Townhouse consumers don’t need new development, however are drawn to intestine rehabs if the upgrades are in keeping with the unique structure and the outside partitions stay.
Wanting again in time
The median value of a Manhattan townhouse in 2015, when the “Stone Home” final bought, indicated it was priced nicely above market and bigger than the typical sale dimension on the time. This sample, together with market suggestions from brokers and consumers, indicated that the architect related to the townhouse added a premium to the market worth (regardless of the improve), doubtless attributable to his well-known worldwide portfolio.
That was not the case with the “Bubble Home.”
Ultimate ideas
Bubble Home: Maurice Medcalf’s redesign didn’t translate into model fairness with consumers; the design learn as idiosyncratic and dated relatively than collectible.
Stone Home: Edward Durell Stone’s title and institutional work (GM Constructing, Kennedy Middle, 2 Columbus Circle) created a fan base that supported a pricing premium and purchaser enthusiasm for preservation.
The precise ultimate thought — Some Random House.
Learn extra Housing Notes columns and join electronic mail newsletters here.
Learn extra
Manhattan’s luxury market cools off after hitting year high
Housing Notes: Record 55% say their finances are getting worse. The other 45% don’t check.
