BankUnited will not be strolling away from a $14.2 million mortgage dispute with Harry Macklowe simply but. After dropping the trial in April, the lender is now taking the legendary Manhattan developer to an appeals courtroom.
The dispute stems from a improvement mortgage the lender issued to Macklowe in December 2013. Macklowe used hire income from a Walgreens lease at 310 East 53 Avenue — for which, in keeping with the lawsuit, he signed for 99-years in 2006 — to service the mortgage. However in March 2022, two months after the lease expired with out the tenant extending the choice, Macklowe defaulted on the word.
Between December 2013 and October 2022, Macklowe had paid off simply over 1 / 4 of the unique mortgage, in keeping with courtroom paperwork, leaving a $10.5 million principal stability. BankUnited filed a lawsuit in November 2022 in opposition to his entity, Grey-Line Growth, and Macklowe for practically $12 million in unpaid principal, curiosity and charges.
BankUnited secured an early partial win in November 2024, when a choose ordered Macklowe to pay lacking month-to-month funds of $67,000 till he secured a brand new tenant for the business area. The area has remained vacant ever since.
That wasn’t sufficient for BankUnited. In September 2025, the plaintiff pushed the case to a bench trial, claiming that if the property can’t earn money to repay the mortgage, Macklowe needed to personally pay down the remaining tens of millions.
This April, the financial institution’s authorized pursuit collapsed when Decide Jennifer G. Schecter dominated in Macklowe’s favor, explicitly stating within the choice that the settlement didn’t set up fundamental phrases.
The doc “doesn’t clearly set forth essentially the most fundamental, elementary phrases of the warranty: how a lot Macklowe should pay and when he should pay,” the ruling says.
Moreover, the courtroom discovered no proof of the events’ “assembly of the minds,” or mutual settlement on the phrases of the settlement, declaring that inner notes offered by BankUnited as a proof had been by no means really shared with Macklowe or his staff throughout negotiations.
The ruling revealed that BankUnited had tried to get Macklowe to retroactively comply with their interpretation after realizing the paperwork had been lacking materials phrases. Macklowe refused, which might be construed, the choose Schecter wrote, as “additional proof of an absence of a gathering of the minds or just as Macklowe being opportunistic.”
Finally, “incoherent” BankUnited’s paperwork had resulted within the trial victory for Macklowe.
The financial institution, nonetheless, will not be backing down simply but. The enchantment filed on Could 28 was formalized with the Appellate Division, First Division in New York on June 24, setting the stage for the following chapter of the authorized battle.
Attorneys for each BankUnited and Macklowe didn’t instantly return requests for remark.
Macklowe is navigating different main courtroom circumstances. In June, an appellate courtroom handed the developer a setback in his ongoing litigation over alleged development defects at his ultra-luxury supertall, 432 Park Avenue.
The courtroom rejected Macklowe’s bid to power the constructing’s apartment board to cowl his mounting authorized charges in a 2021 lawsuit that claims the developer left the tower “riddled” with development defects, together with “insupportable” noise points, flooding and cracks within the partitions.
Learn extra
Housing Notes: Developers are in on the joke: Apologize later
New York judges deal setback for Harry Macklowe in 432 Park legal battle
Harry Macklowe tries selling 432 Park home he lost
