Detroit-based Rocket Firms was hit with a class-action lawsuit on Monday that accuses one of many nation’s largest mortgage lenders of steering shoppers to their mortgage merchandise, “regardless that Rocket Mortgage‘s phrases are disadvantageous to the shoppers.”
The swimsuit was filed within the U.S. District Courtroom for the Japanese District of Michigan. The plaintiffs are represented by Hagens Berman, a shopper safety legislation agency that was additionally concerned in comparable litigation in opposition to Zillow and the National Association of Realtors.
In a press launch asserting the motion, the legislation agency mentioned that Rocket — together with its associates Rocket Mortgage, Amrock Holdings and Rocket Houses Actual Property, which have been additionally named as defendants — conspired to “stress shoppers to make use of Rocket’s mortgage firm to finance their buy.” The defendants are additionally accused of funneling results in actual property brokers who push shoppers to Rocket and “away from different suppliers with cost-saving alternatives, in violation of an actual property agent’s fiduciary duties to their shoppers.”
The agency went on to say that up till its acquisition of Redfin in 2025, Rocket Houses’s web site utilized a “huge referral community” to attach potential homebuyers with third-party actual property brokers, who have been required to pay a 35% referral charge and steer shoppers to Rocket Mortgage.
“On a regular basis households depend on the legal guidelines governing our nation’s actual property marketplace for equity and transparency, and we imagine Rocket has did not play by the foundations,” mentioned Steve W. Berman, managing accomplice and co-founder of Hagens Berman. “We imagine at the very least tons of of 1000’s of shoppers have been duped by Rocket’s methods, and judging by its year-over-year income, its scheme has labored.”
Rocket Firms didn’t instantly reply to HousingWire‘s request for remark.
The lawsuit pointed to Rocket Firms’ third-quarter 2025 earnings report during which the corporate posted $1.78 billion in income, good for year-over-year development of 148%. By this measure, the legislation agency states, the corporate’s steering program “has been a convincing success.”
“Shopping for a house is most certainly the biggest buy any particular person will make of their lifetime, and housing is a primary want,” Berman mentioned. “That Rocket sought to capitalize on this by pressuring homebuyers into unhealthy loans just isn’t solely unlawful, however immoral.”
The lawsuit claims that Rocket violated the Actual Property Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA). It seeks treble damages, single damages, disgorgement and injunctive reduction to cease Rocket’s alleged steering practices, which have been dropped at mild on account of a four-year federal investigation by the Consumer Finance Protection Bureau.
Editor’s observe: This can be a creating story and will likely be up to date as extra info turns into accessible.
