REX filed a petition asking the Supreme Courtroom to rehear its writ of certiorari in November. The excessive court docket additionally denied REX’s unique petition in late October. Sometimes, the Supreme Courtroom chooses instances which have nationwide significance or people who give it the chance to set an essential authorized precedent.
Initially filed by REX in March 2021, the lawsuit alleges that NAR and Zillow broke antitrust legal guidelines when NAR promulgated its elective no-commingling rule and Zillow redesigned its web site with a purpose to comply with the rule inside the MLSs that adopted it.
Decide Thomas Zilly, who oversaw the case, dismissed REX’s antitrust claims towards NAR and Zillow in a abstract judgment ruling. REX appealed this ruling to the Ninth Circuit Courtroom of Appeals, which affirmed the decrease court docket’s ruling.
In April 2025, the Ninth Circuit denied REX’s request for a rehearing, leaving REX no different however to file with the Supreme Court, which it did in late September 2025.
NAR removed the elective no-commingling rule in June, and the commerce group has maintained that the rule doesn’t violate antitrust guidelines.
“Each the district court docket and the ninth Circuit Courtroom of Appeals affirmed this, and the Supreme Courtroom has denied certiorari. Native MLSs play a key function in fostering clear, aggressive, and honest housing markets by delivering shoppers essentially the most correct and up-to-date info on house listings,” a NAR spokesperson advised HousingWire in November.
“Whereas the elective rule is not in impact, NAR stays dedicated to defending the advantages MLSs present brokers, shoppers, and the business.”
