Utah lawmakers opened their 2026 legislative agenda with a proposal to revive a once-bedrock fixture of the American Dream of homeownership: starter properties. By streamlining allow approvals and rezoning for smaller property tons, Beehive State legislators will attempt to pry open a path to first-time homeownership.
The invoice would scale back minimal lot sizes to encourage the development of starter properties and enhance problematic statewide housing affordability. The brand new measure comes a 12 months after Utah Gov. Spencer Cox set a aim of constructing 35,000 starter properties by the top of 2028, and builds on a sequence of housing reforms signed into legislation final 12 months.
“We desperately want extra entry factors into possession, not simply extra items on a spreadsheet,” stated Patrick Danger, a Salt Lake Metropolis residential land dealer with Northmarq, in an interview with The Builder’s Every day.
If efforts in different states on starter properties are any indicator of the percentages of success, a Utah invoice faces a difficult street forward. Throughout the nation, state legislatures have tried “starter house” or minimum-lot-size reforms, to little avail.
Texas and Maine are the one two states which have lowered minimal lot sizes as a foundation to encourage smaller – maybe starter – house improvement. Maine went to five,000 sq. toes whereas Texas lawmakers settled on 3,000 sq. toes. The Lone Star State sponsors initially sought 1,400 sq. toes, according to what Houston has had in place for many years.
Non-starter state efforts
Arizona’s current historical past on this space stands out for a way futile such efforts will be. The Arizona Starter Properties Act has failed for 2 consecutive years. Gov. Katie Hobbs vetoed the invoice in 2024, and the hassle stalled final 12 months amid opposition from the League of Arizona Cities and Cities. Such organizations are inclined to oppose housing reform, notably when it entails preemption of native zoning authority. The Arizona invoice sought to abolish native minimal lot-size guidelines in new subdivisions and to require bigger cities to allow tons as small as 1,500 to three,000 sq. toes.
For Utah lawmakers, the meager observe document of success reveals that starter-home payments invite intense metropolis backlash and rework comparatively innocuous zoning tweaks into bruising housing fracases.
State inhabitants surge meets housing affordability problem
Utah’s job and inhabitants progress have been robust since 2010, making it one of many fastest-growing states within the nation. College of Utah’s Gardner Coverage Institute estimated in November that the state is on tempo so as to add 2 million extra folks over the following 4 a long time.
With that progress, nevertheless, housing affordability has turn into problematic.
“Housing affordability continued to problem new consumers as Utah’s homeownership price declined to the bottom degree in a long time,” the Institute famous in its annual financial report to the governor. The Institute recognized excessive housing prices as a possible financial danger. The report famous that Utah’s housing market confirmed modest progress, with house costs rising simply 2%. That improve was slower than each inflation and revenue features.
But affordability stays a significant hurdle for brand new consumers, and the state’s homeownership price has reached its lowest degree in a long time. The report ranked Utah thirtieth nationally on homeownership.
Discovering options for housing affordability
Utah state officers estimated throughout a current strategic planning course of that the state wants 274,000 new housing items by 2033 to fulfill demand. That estimate underscores the size of the problem. Governor Cox’s aim is 150,000 items by the top of 2028, together with 35,000 starter properties.
That’s the place Home Invoice 184, dubbed Native Land Use Revisions, enters the combination. It could enable properties on smaller tons than the present zoning permits in Utah cities. Builders would request permission to construct on smaller tons. The invoice would give native governments 30 days to reply to these requests, or they might be routinely accepted.
Utah lawmakers made housing a prime precedence in 2025. They handed a invoice that strengthened moderate-income housing guidelines. HB 37 permits cities and counties to allow higher-density single-family improvement in alternate for affordability and possession ensures. It offers native governments flexibility to approve compact neighborhood designs that promote homeownership and increase housing decisions throughout revenue ranges.
Builders can earn density bonuses by assembly particular affordability and dimension necessities tied to long-term group funding. These necessities embrace permitting deed restrictions to require no less than 60% of items to be owner-occupied for 5 years. One other requirement is that 25% of items be reasonably priced to households incomes as much as 120% of the county’s median revenue. Or, no less than 25% of items should be smaller than 1,600 sq. toes.
Supporters stated the invoice balances progress and affordability by encouraging mixed-income, owner-occupied neighborhoods with out altering current group character. The legislation connects all this to earlier first-home and infill instruments. It encourages new properties close to transit traces, job facilities and procuring areas. Lawmakers stated the aim is extra properties in sensible places, not limitless sprawl.
Different 2025 payments performed smaller roles. One invoice tweaked guidelines for “house possession promotion zones” and the way they spend income. One other invoice adjusted land-use and improvement procedures that form how tasks transfer ahead.
Lowering friction to constructing extra properties
Utah’s strategy to housing reform aligns with comparable efforts in neighboring states and throughout the nation. Colorado, for instance, handed a slew of legal guidelines to hurry up housing development and permit extra housing sorts to enhance affordability.
“The concentrate on lot dimension flexibility and starter-home definitions is directionally proper,” land dealer Patrick Danger stated. His concern is whether or not the invoice achieves the aim of accelerating the variety of starter properties or shifts decision-making with out addressing the complete prices of constructing. Land, impression charges, financing and infrastructure nonetheless matter. “If these don’t transfer in parallel, we danger passing a invoice that sounds daring however doesn’t meaningfully change outcomes on the bottom,” he stated.
